Cultural awareness should trump president’s travel ban

Illustration by Destiny Kranthoven.

EDITORIAL:

On Friday, Jan. 27 2017, President Donald J. Trump issued an executive order calling for a strict investigation of certain foreign nationals pursuing entry into the United States.

This order prevents citizens of the following seven Muslim majority countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, from entering into the U.S. for 120 days while the investigation occurs, and prevents Syrian refugees from entering the U.S. indefinitely.

We, The Ranger, do not believe the United States’ borders should be open without regulation, but it seems the way this executive order is being carried out will provoke fear of and discrimination toward students and individuals simply because of their cultural backgrounds.

We do want our government to protect national security and prevent acts of terrorism, but, in the process of doing so, we do not want our government to fuel anti-immigrant hatred and prompt individuals to fear or disrespect people from other cultures.

It is ironic that the most recent issue of the Ranger is focused on cultural awareness and international travel at the same time Trump’s executive order is making travel more difficult and is stopping immigrants and refugees from entering the U.S.

Study abroad programs provide the opportunity to experience new cultures, environments and knowledge, while furthering one’s education; however, we also have the opportunity to build our cultural awareness without leaving town.

Amarillo College has an incredibly diverse population that includes students from Burma, Nigeria, India, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia and the Sudan. We can learn a great deal from these refugees and immigrants—many of whom represent the people Trump’s executive order intends to keep out.

America is a country founded by immigrants, yet the president’s actions have left immigrants detained and denied entry to the U.S.

The executive order is designed to regulate borders and prevent acts of terrorism, and should not result in fear, hate crimes, discrimination, violence, protests or anything that further divides our population. This order is not a reason for our country to become more divided and hate-driven. We should welcome those with different cultural backgrounds than our own and take this time to learn about their values and beliefs.

We should continue to enrich ourselves in others’ cultures, whether that involves travel, or simply getting to know an individual in one’s hometown whose culture differs from his or her own.

We urge you to take this time to promote acceptance and cultural awareness. This order does not change one’s ability to spread awareness, acceptance and knowledge—so do not let it.

1 Comment

  1. President Trump’s executive order halting refugees from entering the United States for 120 days has been attacked as un-American and unfathomable by protestors who have made it clear that, as far as they’re concerned, refugees are welcome in the United States.

    But it’s hard to take these protestors seriously when, five years ago, President Obama similarly banned refugees from a specific Muslim country due to security concerns – and back then, the left didn’t seem to mind much.

    In 2013, an ABC News investigation made a startling discovery: a terrorist who had built IEDs in Iraq to kill U.S. troops had used the refugee program to move to the United States in 2009. Despite the vetting process, he made it through and moved to Kentucky.

    After an intelligence tip, the FBI launched an investigation and Waad Ramadan Alwan was finally apprehended in 2011 in an undercover sting. (You can read the whole remarkable story here.) But the terrifying revelation prompted the government to look into just how flawed the process at the time was:

    “I wouldn’t be surprised if there were many more than that,” said House Committee on Homeland Security Chairman Michael McCaul. “And these are trained terrorists in the art of bombmaking that are inside the United States; and quite frankly, from a homeland security perspective, that really concerns me.”

    Here’s where it gets interesting. During the subsequent investigation, while the vetting process was under review, the State Department quietly stopped processing Iraq refugee applications for six months, even for those who had assisted U.S. forces:

    As a result of the Kentucky case, the State Department stopped processing Iraq refugees for six months in 2011, federal officials told ABC News – even for many who had heroically helped U.S. forces as interpreters and intelligence assets. One Iraqi who had aided American troops was assassinated before his refugee application could be processed, because of the immigration delays, two U.S. officials said.

    There is little daylight between Obama’s 2011 refugee ban and Trump’s. Obama’s ban targeted a Muslim-majority nation; Trump’s targets seven (a list formed by Obama, by the way.) Obama’s ban was prompted by concerns that terrorists in Iraq could use the program to infiltrate the United States; Trump’s ban was prompted by concerns that terrorists in these seven countries could use the program to infiltrate the United States. Obama’s ban was put in place while the vetting process went under review; Trump’s is designed to do the same thing.

    Here’s one key difference, though: Obama’s six month ban was actually longer than Trump’s, which only lasts 120 days.

    Obama’s 2011 policy may have been justified, or it may have been overzealous – either way, it didn’t send protestors pouring into the streets. No one was slamming Obama as un-American for putting American security interests ahead of foreign refugees.

    Which begs the question: are these protestors genuinely concerned about refugees? Or are they more concerned about using this issue as a wedge to oppose Trump?

    http://ijr.com/opinion/2017/01/263661-fact-obama-banned-refugees-iraq-six-months-2011-security-concerns/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*